Survey results: environmental impact of injectables

S

“The message is loud and clear; MS’ers and other MS stakeholders think that you should consider the environmental impact of DMTs when making your decision about which one to choose. I assume the more frequent injectables will come off the worst. Clearly this needs to be studied formally.” 


“Are there any health economists out there who are interested in doing a formal environmental impact study in relation to MS DMTs?”

About the author

Prof G

Professor of Neurology, Barts & The London. MS & Preventive Neurology thinker, blogger, runner, vegetable gardener, husband, father, cook and wine & food lover.

2 comments

  • Re: "43% vs 50% is not exactly loud & clear!"

    The interpretation is pretty clear to me; in fact a very democratic interpretation. You may interested in the following figures from the last 3 US Elections; clear or not so clear?

    2008: Obama 53% vs. McCain 46%
    2004: Bush 50.7% vs. Kerry 48.3%
    2000: Bush 47.9% vs. Gore 48.5%

    You have draw the line somewhere. If 50% of MS'ers think it is important that is good enough for me!

By Prof G

Translate

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives