Brutons Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Relapsing MS


The race is on between the different Pharma to get their Brutons tyrosine kinase inhibitors into the clinic. There are at least four different variants in the hunt and most are been tested in phase III studies in relapsing and progressive MS. They inhibit B cell activation so perhaps unsurprisingly they inhibit relapsing MS and this can be shown within a few weeks using MRI outcomes, as shown here.

However, one could say “So what!” “Don’t CD20 depleters do this anyway? It’s just another way to do the same thing”. However, this is not a depleting therapy benefits in some ways but the question will arise on how do you transition from them to prevent rebound? That’s down the road.

Importantly are they any better than monoclonal antibodies?. The chances of a head to head in trial of BTK inhibitor to anti-CD20 is minimal… not say anything about the investigators happy to compare these agents against low hanging fruit (teriflunomide etc.)/placebo knowing that people will do less well on them, when there are better alternatives.

However, the big promise of these agents are that they are microglia inhibitors and so will they stop/slow progression? Will the slowly expanding lesions stop expanding. The study is probably too short and too small to get an answer to this but phase III is occuring.

I could say watch this space, but if they work the Investors get to hear first, before a late Breaker at the ECTRIMS/AAN

Reich DS, Arnold DL, Vermersch P, Bar-Or A, Fox RJ, Matta A, Turner T, Wallström E, Zhang X, Mareš M, Khabirov FA, Traboulsee A; Tolebrutinib Phase 2b Study Group. Safety and efficacy of tolebrutinib, an oral brain-penetrant BTK inhibitor, in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Sep;20(9):729-738. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00237-4. PMID: 34418400.

Background: Tolebrutinib is an oral, CNS-penetrant, irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, an enzyme expressed in B lymphocytes and myeloid cells including microglia, which are major drivers of inflammation in multiple sclerosis. We aimed to determine the dose-response relationship between tolebrutinib and the reduction in new active brain MRI lesions in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Methods: We did a 16-week, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-finding trial at 40 centres (academic sites, specialty clinics, and general neurology centres) in ten countries in Europe and North America. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-55 years with diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis (either relapsing-remitting or relapsing secondary progressive multiple sclerosis), and one or more of the following criteria: at least one relapse within the previous year, at least two relapses within the previous 2 years, or at least one active gadolinium-enhancing brain lesion in the 6 months before screening. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of primary progressive multiple sclerosis or a diagnosis of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis without relapse. We used a two-step randomisation process to randomly assign eligible participants (1:1) to two cohorts, then further randomly assign participants in each cohort (1:1:1:1) to four tolebrutinib dose groups (5, 15, 30, and 60 mg administered once daily as an oral tablet). Cohort 1 received tolebrutinib for 12 weeks, then matched placebo (ie, identical looking tablets) for 4 weeks; cohort 2 received 4 weeks of placebo followed by 12 weeks of tolebrutinib. Participants and investigators were masked for dose and tolebrutinib-placebo administration sequence; investigators, study team members, and study participants did not have access to unmasked data. MRI scans were done at screening and every 4 weeks over 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of new gadolinium-enhancing lesions detected on the scan done after 12 weeks of tolebrutinib treatment (assessed at week 12 for cohort 1 and week 16 for cohort 2), relative to the scan done 4 weeks previously, and compared with the lesions accumulated during 4 weeks of placebo run-in period in cohort 2. Efficacy data were analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, using a two-step multiple comparison procedure with modelling analysis. Safety was assessed for all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with (NCT03889639), EudraCT (2018-003927-12), and WHO (U1111-1220-0572), and has been completed.

Findings: Between May 14, 2019, and Jan 2, 2020, we enrolled and randomly assigned 130 participants to tolebrutinib: 33 to 5 mg, 32 to 15 mg, 33 to 30 mg, and 32 to 60 mg. 129 (99%) completed the treatment regimen and 126 were included in the primary analysis. At treatment week 12, there was a dose-dependent reduction in the number of new gadolinium-enhancing lesions (mean [SD] lesions per patient: placebo, 1·03 [2·50]; 5 mg, 1·39 [3·20]; 15 mg, 0·77 [1·48]; 30 mg, 0·76 [3·31]; 60 mg, 0·13 [0·43]; p=0·03). One serious adverse event was reported (one patient in the 60 mg group was admitted to hospital because of a multiple sclerosis relapse). The most common non-serious adverse event during tolebrutinib treatment was headache (in one [3%] of 33 in the 5 mg group; three [9%] of 32 in the 15 mg group; one [3%] of 33 in the 30 mg group; and four [13%] of 32 in the 60 mg group). No safety-related discontinuations or treatment-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation: 12 weeks of tolebrutinib treatment led to a dose-dependent reduction in new gadolinium-enhancing lesions, the 60 mg dose being the most efficacious, and the drug was well tolerated. Reduction of acute inflammation, combined with the potential to modulate the immune response within the CNS, provides a scientific rationale to pursue phase 3 clinical trials of tolebrutinib in patients with relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis.

COI: Multiple Non relevant….yet.

General Disclaimer: Please note that the opinions expressed here are those of author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry nor Barts Health NHS Trust and are not meant to be interpreted as personal clinical advice. 

About the author



By MouseDoctor



Recent Posts

Recent Comments