This a re-post but many of the readers wont have seen this before and it was one of the most popular posts. I will be digging stuff from the archive
The brain
The brain has three main parts: the cerebrum, the cerebellum and the brain stem. The cerebrum is the big part on the top which most people think of as the brain. The cerebellum is the smaller, roundish part that lies underneath the back of the cerebrum. The brain stem is the part that joins the brain to the spinal cord. It lies underneath the cerebrum, in front of the cerebellum and is at the top of the spinal cord.
The brain has three main types of “matter”, i.e. stuff. Gray matter is the stuff that does all the processing, encoding and storage – basically the “thinking”. White matter is the stuff that carries the signals between different parts of gray matter. If you imagine your phone connected to your computer via a USB cable, the phone and the computer are different parts of gray matter and the USB cable is the white matter allowing them to communicate with each other. Gray and white matter are made up of billions of neurons, or nerves: gray matter contains the main bodies of the nerves and white matter contains the tails of the nerves, called axons. Nerves that need to transmit fast signals have a myelin coating on their axons.
The third type of matter is CSF (cerebrospinal fluid). It bathes the brain, cushioning it and providing nourishment. There are reservoirs of CSF in the brain, the contents of which are continually refreshed by our bodies. These reservoirs are called ventricles. The biggest of these are called the lateral ventricles. If you slice the head from the eyes to the back of the skull and look down at it, you will see the lateral ventricles, one on either side of the line down the middle of the cerebrum, looking a bit like a butterfly.
Humans have evolved to have a lot of brain matter, so the only way to fit it all into the skull is to squeeze it together, like squishing up a piece of cloth to fit it into a tight space. This means that the cerebrum has lots of folds in it. The bits that go in are called sulci (a single sulci is called a sulcus) and the bits that go out are called gyri (a single gyri is called a gyrus) and they all have names. [Mammals that aren’t as intelligent as humans have smoother cerebrums, with fewer sulci and gyri, if any.]. Mice are a bit thick. You can see they have a massive cerebellum at the back (which controls balance and movement) and the two knobs at the front are the olfactory bulbs, because they are big on smell
The cerebrum has two halves, or hemispheres, which are approximate mirror images of each other. They are joined only by some tracts of white matter (like a bunch of USB cables instead of just one), so the two halves can work together. The main tract of white matter joining the two hemispheres is called the corpus callosum. It is in the middle of the cerebrum, next to the lateral ventricles. If you cut the corpus callosum, the left side and right side of the cerebrum cannot communicate properly. It is quite common for people with MS to have lesions on the corpus callosum. (A lesion is an area of damage or abnormality.)
Red bit is the corpus callosum, the highway between the halves of the brain
The cerebrum is split into four “lobes” (areas): frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital. Because the cerebrum has two halves, there are right and left frontal lobes, right and left parietal lobes, etc. The frontal lobe is more or less the front half of the cerebrum. It stops at the “central sulcus”. The parietal and temporal lobes lie behind the frontal lobe with the parietal lobe at the top of the head and the temporal lobes at the sides, more or less behind your ears. The occipital lobe is right at the back. The frontal lobe is important for personality, working memory, decision making, controlling inhibition, movement, etc. The parietal lobe is important for sensation, maths, music, humour, spatial tasks, etc. The temporal lobe is important for hearing, memory, language, emotions, object recognition, etc. The occipital lobe is dedicated to vision.
The outer layers of the cerebrum are made up of gray matter. Together, these layers are called the cortex or cerebral cortex. Anything to do with the cortex is referred to as cortical. (Anything to do with the cerebrum is called cerebral and anything to do with the cerebellum is called cerebellar.) White matter lying close to the cortex is called subcortical (or superficial). White matter lying deeper into the brain is called deep white matter.
:background_color(FFFFFF):format(jpeg)/images/article/en/the-12-cranial-nerves/BJlRqDAfAoB4SnDOELIzQ_Cranial_Nerves_Draft_3.png)
cranial nerves
The McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis stipulate that, to be diagnosed with relapsing remitting MS, patients need to have at least two attacks and at least one lesion in at least two of four specified areas of the central nervous system: three in the brain and one in the spinal cord.

There are some parts of the cortex that are named after what they do. The most obvious of these are the visual cortex, the motor cortex and the somatosensory cortex. The visual cortex is the cortex in the occipital lobe; the gray matter that makes sense of all the information that your eyes gather. The motor cortex is the last gyri of the frontal lobe, the precentral gyrus. It is in charge of movement. The somatosensory cortex is the first gyri of the parietal lobe, the postcentral gyrus. It is on the other side of the central sulcus to the motor cortex and it controls sensation in your body. If you put your hands loosely on both ears, your thumbs are pointing towards your visual cortex, your left and right ring fingers are pointing roughly towards your left and right motor cortices and your middle fingers are pointing roughly towards your somatosensory cortices.
o Anterior: in front; towards the front of the brain
o Posterior: behind; towards the back of the brain
o Superior: above; towards the top of the brain
o Inferior: below; towards the spinal cord
o Horn/tip: refers to the ends of the lateral ventricles; the “wing tips” of the butterfly shape.
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
The way MRI works is that different types of matter give off different levels of energy when they are placed in a magnetic field. The computer slices the thing being scanned and collects the energy signal from one slice at a time. Because of some of the loud banging noises the scanner makes, it can also work out the signal from small cubes of each slice. These cubes are called voxels (short for volume pixels).
Each slice provides the information for one image and each voxel provides the information for one pixel in that image. The whole process uses some very advanced mathematics, but ultimately, the higher the overall signal from a voxel, the brighter the pixel is on the final image (and the lower the signal, the darker the pixel).
Sometimes, neuros ask for a scan with contrast. This is a T1 scan taken after the patient has been injected with a “contrast agent”. This is usually gadolinium which looks bright white on a T1 scan. The central nervous system, i.e. the brain and spinal cord, is protected by the blood brain barrier (bbb) which stops things that might harm it from getting in; gadolinium normally can’t get through the bbb.
In MS, cells from the immune system get through the Blood brain barrier and attack the myelin coating of nerves in that area, causing inflammation and damage: a lesion. While this is happening, the lesion is called “active”, “enhancing” or “contrast enhancing”. The gap the immune system has caused in the blood brain barrier allows gadolinium to get in. If there are no breaches in the blood brain barrier there should be no bright white signs of gadolinium inside the brain or spinal cord. If there are, these show where there are breaches, in other words, where the immune system is actively causing new damage.
Contrast is used for two main reasons: to show up very new lesions (typically lesions newer than about two to six weeks) because these can be difficult to see on normal MRI and to help show which lesions are active and which are not as this can be important for deciding on meds.
Some terms you might come across:(a) Axial: images taken from front to back side to side, at right angles to the nose
The 2 dimensional slice images taken through the brain are stacked to create a 3D image
o Artifact/artifact: a computer error, nothing to worry about
o 1.5T (and other numbers followed by a T): This is scanner strength, i.e. how strong the magnetic field is that the scanner produces. The T is short for Tesla, but has nothing to do with the T in T1 and T2 scans.
Most NHS scanners are 1.5T. There are a few 3T (and stronger) scanners that are much more powerful than 1.5T scanners. Do not assume that private MRI scanners (or scans) are better than NHS scanners (or scans) – they are mostly the same, but can be worse. There are also 7T very strong scanners usually run in some University Hospitals.
However, if it’s a big voxel, the extra signal from the lesion might only make the pixel a bit paler than its neighbour and make it very easy to miss. So, the moral of the story: it’s important to have thin slices and small voxels! 3mm slices are fine. Less than that is great, more than that and you are losing a lot of definition and increasing the chances of missing small lesions.By the time you get to 6mm and thicker, you could miss average and even bigger than average lesions too. (The average MS lesion is 7mm.)
The slice thickness is not usually written in reports or on images, but the number of images is the same as the number of slices so the greater the number of images in one scan, the thinner the slices. The best images generally come from thin slices with small voxels on a stronger scanner, but small voxels on a 1.5T scanner will be better than big voxels on a 3T scanner every time.
A01. Is this an oil rig, A02 a tank, A03 a car but I think we all see that A04 is a VW Beetle. So with a smaller the voxel size you get clearer pictures
So to recap
When you image these lesions with an MRI you can see different things, depending on the technique, the age (stage) of the lesion, the power of the MRI, and whether contrast is used. The first MRI image is done without contrast. Several different techniques are used in obtaining the images, including two called T1-weighted and T2-weighted. The first pass of the MRI will show old lesions that are big enough to be seen by the power of that MRI machine. WE KNOW that many lesions in MS are too small to be seen in some MRI’s. As each new generation of MRI machines becomes available, it is more powerful and more able to show up areas of damage than the previous generation. If the newer, more powerful MRI more lesions will be seen
The Need for ContrastA newly active MS lesion may not be visible on a regular MRI because the area of nerves, though inflamed, is still pretty much intact and has normal brain density. On the regular MRI it will look like normal brain. Without contrast (gadolinium an magnetic compound) it won’t show up and will likely be missed. When the next phase of MRI is done the contrast is injected into the bloodstream. Wherever the blood vessels are seen as more dilated than usual, bringing more blood to the area, (as in inflammation), the areas will “highlight” or “enhance.” They show up as even brighter than the brain around them and brighter than an old, scarred lesion. So new lesions will appear as “enhancing,” or “active.” Also, older hyperintense lesions that have undergone a new attack right around them (also called reactivation) will show an even brighter enhancing rim or ring. The appearance of an “enhancing ring or rim” is especially characteristic of MS. When you compare the regular MRI to the contrast MRI you can see the increased brightness of this reactivated, old lesion. New lesions with active inflammation will typically show up for 2 to 6 weeks before they scar down and become “old” lesions.
Some radiologists call new lesion inflammation “active lesions.” Others may refer to “new lesions ” or “actively enhancing lesions.” These all refer to the same thing. Also since some new lesions heal, the MRI’s can be compared to old films where they did appear formerly, leading to the conclusion that they have disappeared. In addition, between different sets of MRI done after some time has passed, the radiologist can see an increase in old and in new activity. Right here it is important to remark that, in discussing MS, the word “active” is used in two different ways. If one is speaking about the appearance of lesions on the MRI, “active” simply means that the lesion has “active inflammation” in it. However, if we are discussing a person’s disease and symptoms, an active lesion means one that is causing symptoms.
Another word that is used in two different ways in MRI reports is the word “new.” If the radiologist is comparing the current MRI to an older one, a “new” lesion will be one that shows up now that didn’t show up earlier. It has formed in the time period between the two MRIs. If the radiologist is describing lesions that show enhancement on an MRI, they might refer to these lesions as “new.” The difference is in the context in which the word “new” is used.
In MS the Relapses and Remissions which are so typical of this disease occur because of the attacks on the nerves and then the body’s ability to heal some or most of them. So we can often see the reflection of the disease process in the changes of the MRIs done over time.
Thanks!
A nice and short summary. 🙂
Really helpful post thank you. Where can it be found on the MS Society website as I'm struggling to locate it?
If you click on "Thanks to MS Society for this one"it has a link and it will take you there.
Most of the text appears to be written by someone called Rizzo. It was brought to my attention by a nice lady from Australia along with another post, which she found helpful. I just added a few pictures and a few bits and to help clarify some of the text.
Rizzo is an MSer who used to frequent the boards so credit to them. Good post though thank you. The terminology has always baffled me.
Great information. Thank you for posting this.
Thanks for this – really useful.
One question though (probably one for Dr G). If new inflammation 2-6 weeks old might not show up on MRI without contrast, does this mean that any new patient (ie not yet diagnosed with cis or Ms) who reports with recent onset of symptoms, should have a contrast MRI?
Yes but if disease is active there will be some contrast lesions somewhere. However remember they may be in the spinal cord and not the brain. MRI of the cord is more difficullt than the brain as it is smaller Nd it moves as you breathe.
Mate, fell asleep reading this. Ta.
Cheaper than sleeping pill, i guess faster acting too. Maybe i should patent 🙂
Some people want to know about this stuff, and some don't – each to their own. I hope Anon at 9.36pm enjoyed his snooze – and at least there would have been no drug side effects suffered in the making of his ZZZZZ's!
Thanks to Rizzo and MD – this is incredibly helpful for a MSer who doesn't have a medical background and wants to try to understand as much as possible.
This would be brilliant as a booklet (printed and e) as there is a lot of information to take in so chunking it down to pages and increasing the size of some of the diagrams (cranial nerves, which parts of the brain control which part of the body) would help and it would give the reader the ability to easily dip in and out etc. BTW, and this may provoke sarcastic responses, having diagrams where white matter is coloured white and grey matter is coloured grey would make the diagram quicker to assimilate.
Unlike Anon 9.36 it didn't send me to sleep so hold off on that patent application MD !
Thanks again
"Now the very old, damaged areas that have been reabsorbed will be seen as less dense (empty) spaces or "black holes" on the T1 images. If there are many of these empty areas, the brain will eventually contract and shrink around them. This will be depicted as a loss of brain volume. This is also known as brain atrophy."
I believe atrophy occurs even in the early stages of RRMS. I have RRMS but no black holes. On my last MRI, the neurologist commented that I might have atrophy ocuring (comparing to scans from 4 years ago). Is this a different type of atrophy not associate with black holes?
The black holes are not really empty spaces.In the MRI they may look like empty because they are dark but are probably packed full of scar tissue made up of astrocytes. Don't think of black holes hoovering up nerve tissue like a black hole in physics.
When talking about atrophy we are thinking of loss of nerve cells and as the nerves get damage the brain shrinks which is atrophy.
However the blackholes (astrocytes) fill the space created by nerve damage and so actually makes it look like the brain is shrinking less than it is really is in terms of nerve damage.
The best way of looking for shrinkage at present is to compare your scan to was before and sometime later and you can see changes in the volume before and after. I will post some scans to show this.
Where are the periaqueductal and posterior supratrigonal regions please and what do they control?.
Does greater prominent high signal intensity change but no enhancement mean not active but has been?
Sorry for my questions but its a whole difference language!
I would like feed back about my situation. I was diagnosed with MS in 2003. They think I probably had MS since 2001. I was taking Copaxone for several years, have stopped and take no meds now. I in fact stopped taking Copaxone around 2009 I believe. Date of MRIs that I know are May 2008, December 2008, August 2010 and July 2015. According to the MRI Reports there was no change in the Aug 2010 MRI when compared to May 2008 and there was no change in the July 2015 MRI when compared to the Aug 2010 MRI. I used to have l'hermittes sign- it's gone. I used to have double vision- it's gone. I know I used to have involvement with the corpus collosum and now that's clean in the last MRI. My largest lesion which was spotted in 2003 has shrunk. I have no weakness. I saw a neurologist recently and he did not have a copy of my old file, nor any of my MRI scans or MRI reports. He took a medical history from me and did a few routine tests. He told me he wanted me to start taking Gilenya. When I asked questions about the drug he told me to go home and research it on the internet. When I asked about cases of MS being Benign, he said what I had was information and while he had knowledge. He said it doesn't matter if there was no change in the MRI scans over the last 7 years- that the disease was still active. The only reason he knew that there was no new activity was because I had read the report before I had my appointment with him and told him what it said. So I guess my question is– would you take a drug that will most likely make me feel sick and has potentially life threatening side effects when you felt fine and had clean MRIs? I also try to eat clean and exercise. I clock about 15 miles a week of strenuous hiking. I drink lots of water. In other words I try to live healthy. I feel like I should get a second opinion but wonder if I should waste my time and money. These appointments are not cheap!
We cannot and do not give consultations sorry.
You’ll make a better decision if you are fully informed, which isn’t the case at the moment. A decision which may affect how you live in older age – with all that that implies – needs to be made with full awareness of risk and cost-benefits and that’s not something you’ll get in a standard neuro appointment. I had a similar big decision to make last year and hated the to-ing and fro-ing of my thoughts. I couldn’t clarify things in my head and yet I knew I had to. A private appointment with my neuro was the answer. Forty-five minutes of him giving me the answers to the dozen or so questions/doubts I’d been wrestling with. I then felt I saw the context for his earlier advice and it was easy to go from there. It was expensive, involved a day of travel and was absolutely the right thing to do.
why it is desirable to look at whole brain in MS.
So you can see what is going on
For people who are trying to be diagnosed, If the MRI with contrast only shows new lesions for 2-6 weeks But we're not scanned in that time and did not leave 'black holes', would it leave any other marker?
Yes typically afte being a T1 gadolinium enhancing lesion the place where the lesion was, will be picked up as a T2 lesion, so this is why T2 lesion volume gives an idea of he accumulation of lesions over time
Question about signal on MRI,
What would it mean if a lesion is T2 and FLAIR hyperintense, but has associated T1 hypointensity on a non-contrast MRI? How can it have both characteristics?
I would like to know the answer to that also
Perhaps Dr K can answer this?
Can anyone please guide that in which order MRI machine take scans of the head or brain??
I've a complete dataset of patient. The problem i'm getting in rendering of those images that i'm not getting the order. From which angle scanning started? How to sequence them in order from one particular side ?
Thanks
Great! Thank you!
Can you add a diagram that shows, “The brain
The brain has three main parts: the cerebrum, the cerebellum and the brain stem. The cerebrum is the big part on the top which most people think of as the brain. The cerebellum is the smaller, roundish part that lies underneath the back of the cerebrum. The brain stem is the part that joins the brain to the spinal cord. It lies underneath the cerebrum, in front of the cerebellum and is at the top of the spinal cord.”?
picture added